Managing Change - Click for Home Page

  Why Ads? 

Digital, Interactive and Web TV

Sceptics

The counter argument is shown as in the paragraph prefixed by an O.

Incompatible Decoders

Take up will be Slow

There is Sufficient Television

There is Insufficient Added Value

More Channels means Lower Quality Programmes

Television and PCs are Suited to Different Roles

The Picture Quality is Not Really Improved

The Sound Quality is Not Really Improved

 

Next is Advertising Industry
Blank Start Back Up Forward End Blank

External Resources
 

  1. Barnett, Steven, 1997, The TV choice we will not buy, The Independent, 11 February 1997
  2. Newman, Cathy, 1998, Viewers at odds over analogue TV turn off, Financial Times, 27 April 1998.
  3. Wiseman, Andrew, Television Room
  4. Also see the full list of resources for this web site for other related resources.


[Digital TV Content] [Introduction] [Summary] [No. Customers] [US Scene] [European Scene] [Scene Elsewhere]
[Delivery Channels] [Players] [H/w & S/w] [EPGs] [Existing Services] [New Services] [Audience] [Disadvantages]
[Advantages] [Sceptics] [Advertising] [Financial Services]

[Mediums Overview] [SIM Report Mediums] [More Recent DevelopmentsUnder Construction] [Which to Use?] [Other TechnologiesUnder Construction]


[SIM Overview] [One to One Marketing] [Mass Customisation] [Interactive Mediums] [STEP Analysis]
 [SIM Executive Summary] [SIM Report] [SIM Project] [SIM Framework] [SIM Methodology] [SIM Illustrations] [SIM Links]

[Key Information & Resources] [Guest Contributions] [List of Support Topics] [What's On]


[Contact] [Company] [Disclaimer] [Privacy] [Legal] [Copyright Fair Use] [Feedback] [Publications]
[Publicity] [Why Ads?] [What's New] [What's Coming] [Technical Info]

Home  [Home]   [Site Search Form]  Search This Site   [For a Full list of Contents see the Site Map] Network

                 

This page updated December 2000   © Managing Change 1997,98,99     www.managingchange.com